Posted by Afther Hussain in Uncategorized

step one. But really, from inside the genealogy and family history, we knowthat each laws there can be an exception. A good vexing area ofgenealogy is that not one person most knows how to apply the fresh exclusions orrules that have people decisive adjective eg usually, perhaps, most likely,most likely, etcetera. It might be fascinating in the event that truth be told there almost every other advice ofjointures being produced per year otherwise a couple once a well-known marriage big date.

dos. Could there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation on wedding regarding ElizabethClifford and you can Sir Ralph Bowes who had been 3rd cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or fourth cousins, immediately after taken off the new fifth LordClifford? That would narrow down its matrimony date.

Arthur

Presumably, when the an effective dispensation are found and you will supplied, it might havebeen by the among the many pursuing the, and might are available in this new correspondingregister asianmelodies book, in the event it survives:

Thomas Savage, Archbishop off York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop away from Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out-of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop regarding Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop off Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop of Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop out-of Carlisle 1509-1520

5. In case your 10th Lord Clifford really does get married during the early 1487 [say January] andhas Age later on in that 12 months, do the new chronology maybe not really works?

John arms?

E produced from inside the later 1487, Henry born for the 1488/9, Joan in ,an such like. filling in the fresh new labels of send away from . In the event that (a) thechronology still really works; and (b) their own relationships piece was not lowest; thenwe just have brand new 1505 pedigree out of Henry VII’s which is inside the oppositionto the fresh new supposition one she are a legitimate child.

six. Regarding your 1505 pedigree: Will be Clifford daughters this new onlyknown Henry VII relations omitted? Are there anybody else? In this case,wouldn’t you to definitely mirror poorly about file as a source?

Out-of evaluations We have made of the brand new c.1505 Henry VII Relations pedigreeswith the newest 1480-1500 Visitation of one’s Northern pedigrees, which happen to be

Regarding the c.1505 Relations pedigrees, brand new Clifford youngsters are not listedin a great Clifford pedigree, but alternatively regarding St. John pedigree. While the I’mnot familiar with the fresh St. John friends, pursuing the ‘s the guidance asit seems from the c.1505 pedigree, while the extracted from the new 1834 Coll. Most readily useful. etGen. blog post. New phrasing into the quotations is strictly because it seems inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).

“Zero. XII.”Away from my Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Pole, Mistress Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess away from Somerset got around three husbands.” Because of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My Woman the brand new King’s Mom.” who’d “The fresh new King.” whohad “Prince “From the “Sir Oliver Saint John, basic husband.” she had 3 daus & dos sons:

An excellent. “Edith, wedded to help you Geoffrey Pole from Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married into the Lady Margaret, dau. out-of theDuke out of Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, wedded in order to Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[a different child, unnamed].”

B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously five people:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d “Four daughters and you may oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. so you can Harry Lord Clifford.” They’d “Jane. Mabill.Henry, son and you will heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, married to Thomas Kent, Esq. of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A good Nun of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”

C. “Dame Mary, married so you’re able to Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall with his brethren and you may sistren.” Which have issueindicated, yet not named.C2. “Elizabeth, married to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”

D. “Age, wedded basic into Lord Zouche; after on the LordScrope from Bolton.” Issue:D1. [of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [by the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Having issueindicated but not titled.

Margaret Duchess off Somerset, because of the “Lionel Lord Welles, history husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. of K. Edward IV.” andthey got “Age.”